Engineering stories, series index¶
The engineering standards that shape research-engineering work at NovoMCP. Each post takes one concrete engineering situation and states the standard it established, now applied across teams.
The posts stand alone and compose into one thematic arc: the Loud Failure Standard. Make silent failures loud. Every discipline in the series is that standard applied at a different layer of the stack.
Published¶
- Server-side tool search for a 68-tool MCP platform, April 23, 2026
Drafts (research-engineering discipline series)¶
Seven posts drawn from a single molecular dynamics engineering effort in the summer of 2026. Each post is self-contained. The series arc is the thematic connection between them.
- Predeclared gates in research engineering
- Verification doesn't transitively propagate
- Fallback state as a first-class diagnostic field
- Spec is the source of truth; code reads from it
- When to pause and when to continue: fatigue discipline in long research-engineering sessions
- False-alarm resolution as institutional memory
Each is a draft pending review. The series arc post, synthesizing the standard the seven instances share, belongs at the end of the series, after readers have absorbed the individual patterns.
Drafts (validation series)¶
Drawn from validating a trajectory diagnostic in the summer of 2026. The same standard, one layer beneath the result, in the measurement setup nobody thought to review.
- Configuration is part of the measurement: co-authored with Dal Marsters
Drafts (free-energy series)¶
Drawn from reviewing the free-energy correction design in the summer of 2026. The same standard, applied to written claims before any code exists.
- Bookkeeping and bookending in the FEP layer: reviewing design-doc claims against the standard NovoMCP applies to other methods